Human Evolution: What The Fossil Records Say About Our Ancestors

The evolution of human beings (Homo sapiens) is a subject that fascinates many people.

We all want to know who our ancestors were.

Human beings are mammals, then primates, and then anthropoids. Among the primates, our closest relatives are the Chimpanzees and Bonobos in the genus Pongo. Humanity is in the genus Homo, thus our species is known scientifically as Homo sapiens.

Timeline of known Hominid fossils.
Timeline of known Hominid fossils with approximate dates.

Scientists have three different routes of examining the question of our ancestry. The first is by studying the relationships between us and our nearest living relatives, the second is the morphology of fossil record and the third and most modern is analyzing the DNA extracted from fossils, where possible.

How Closely Related Are Humans To Chimpanzees?

DNA analysis, has been telling us that there is only a 2 to 3 percent genetic difference between us and the chimpanzees for many years now – and you will find the figure of 98.5 percent similarity quoted all over the place.

However, recent more competent research has suggested that the difference might be more than 5 percent and even this figure is only an estimate.

Nevertheless, this is a large enough difference to place them in a separate genus. They are still only our nearest relatives, not our ancestors.

While the examination of fossils does not allow as exact comparisons as DNA and protein analysis of living animals, it does give us a glimpse into the past – allowing us to develop some idea of who we evolved from.

Who Did Humans Evolve From?

However the record is patchy, and scientists are not in agreement as to the best way to interpret it.

The discovery in Africa in 2002 of a good condition fossil skull now named Sahelanthropus tchadensis has upset many of the previously accepted concepts of the flow of human evolution.

This is because the best archaeological dating we have of it places it as having lived between 7 and 10 million years ago. However it has morphological characteristics that are mixture of those we are used to seeing on both Australopithecines and Hominins.

The well developed brow-ridge for instance, is similar to those found on Hominins living less than 2 million years ago. Thus this discovery is forcing scientists to reconsider their theories of human evolution.

evolution of human skull

The most likely answer is that S. tchadensis represents an evolutionary branch that is now extinct and is not a direct ancestor of humanity, or even of the Australopithecines.

This lack of certainty in relationship to the question of exactly which species gave rise to which other, is present in all studies of the fossil record.

In truth, the best we can honestly do is to look at the history as it is presented to us by the fossil record and acknowledge that it is quite likely some of the species represented were our direct ancestors and most weren’t.

Any more serious claims are merely speculation, however well informed and thought out they may be.

The First Primates

To the best of our current knowledge, the first primates evolved between 60 and 70 million years ago with genera like Plesiadapis. Within about 10 to 20 million years, this early group had split into sections. The prosimians, which gave rise to Lemurs and Tarsiers and the Anthropoids which lead to modern Apes, Humans and Monkeys.

Approximately another 10 million years later (between 50 and 40 million years ago) some monkey ancestors found their way to S. America where they became the Ceboidea.

The Ceboidea are distinguished by their widely separated nostrils and their long prehensile (capable of grasping) tail. They also have less opposability in their thumb than their African cousins. At about the same time the ancestors of the modern Old World (Africa, Europe and Asia) monkeys, known as the Cercopithecoidae, separated from the ancestors of the Hominoids.

The earliest known fossil that is reasonably believed to be an ancestor of humanity – and the modern apes – yet distinct from the rest of the primates is Aegytopithecus sp. This is a spaniel-sized animal that lived towards the end of the Oligocene, about 30 million years ago.

It is known from several fossils and is commonly called the ‘dawn ape’ because despite its still highly primitive features, it seems to represent the beginning or dawn of the evolution of humans and apes.

Within the next 10 to 15 million years, we find the lines leading to humanity and the great apes diverging. Twenty million years ago we have Dryopithecus with very ape-like features; 15 million years ago Ramapithecus showing much more hominid characteristics.

Dryopithecus means tree-ape and fossil species of this prolific genus have been found in Africa, Europe and India. One species in particular, D. africanus appears to be a close relative and possibly an ancestor of modern Chimpanzees.

Ramapithecus brevirostris was first discovered by G. E. Lewis in India in 1932 and is named after the Indian god Rama. Since then a number of other fossil teeth and bits of jaw bones have been found that are also considered to from Ramapithecus, some from S. Africa.

After Ramapithecus there is a period of about 8 million years for which we have very few fossils. Orrorin tugenensis along with the more recently discovered Sahelanthropus tchadensis mentioned above occur towards the end of this gap, but neither are considered to be direct ancestors of humanity.

About 4.4 million years ago, we see the first of the Australopithecus fossils (A. anamensis) occurring and it is most likely that the genus Homo arose out of the genus Australopithecus. The relatively recently unearthed species A. sediba has added support to this theory. However it is believed they separated at least 2, if not 3 million years ago. The earliest fossils of the genus Homo are contemporary with with the last of those for the genus Australopithecus. See chart above.

Increasing Brain Size

One important consideration when studying human evolution, is brain size – because the complex society we live in now is dependent on our large brains.

The Australopithecines had brain capacities of around 750 to 800 cc (cubic centimetres) where as Homo erectus, who lived from 1.8 to 0.4 million years ago, had a cranial capacity of 1,000 cc on average. Modern humans have an average cranial capacity of 1,400 cc.

Homo erectus is the best known of the early homonins. They stood 150 to 170 cm (5 to 5.5 ft) tall and had low foreheads, strong browridges and practically no chin. They stood erect and were good walkers on their long straight legs. They lived from Africa across Eurasia to China. They lived, as far as we can tell, in small social groups of perhaps 20 to 50 people.

They used a variety of stone and bone tools for hunting, wrapped themselves in animal skins to survive the cold, used caves and quite possibly built simple wooden shelters. The size and shape of their brain indicate they probably communicated with a simple language.

Java Man, discovered in 1891 by the Dutch anatomist Eugene Dubois, and Peking Man, discovered in 1927 by the Canadian Davidson Black, are now considered to be different races of Homo erectus.

So Who Is The Direct Ancestor Of Humans?

Scientists now recognize 12 species in the genus Homo, with H. neanderthalensis being the most recent of the extinct species and considered by many to be the direct ancestor of H. sapiens. 

However, considering that for most of their fossil record the H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis co-existed it is highly possible that both species arose independently from one or two of the three earlier species: H. erectusH. antecessor and H. heidelbergensis (see graph).

The two recently discovered species H. longi and H. naledi are currently considered to lateral branches, Nature’s experiments if you like, rather than linear ancestors.  However they do indicate that at one time in the past there were at least three, if not more, human species extant in Africa concurrently.

The other two recently recognized species are H. luzonensis from the island of Luzon in the Philippines and H. floresiensis from the Island of Flores in Indonesia.  Both these species are currently considered to be examples of island dwarfism.  This is something that can, and does, happen to any species. It is what occurs when the act of living in isolation on the limited area of an island results in a species becoming smaller than it ancestors until it is eventually a new species.  Both these species exhibit a mix of Australopithecine and early Hominid characteristics.

H. neanderthalensis is commonly know as Neanderthal Man. H. neanderthalensis had a brain capacity of around 1200 cc and he lived all across Europe and Asia, much like H. erectus whom they had replaced.

They used a wide variety of stone tools, particularly flint which they learned to shape to make scrapers, axes, spear points, as well as various borers and blades. Like modern humanity, and the Cro-Magnons who displaced them, they existed in various races.

homo neanderthalensis ancestor
Cast of skulls in Science Museum, Trento, Italy

They still had large faces with forward projecting jaws and brow ridges, however in some groups the brow ridges were disappearing and the back of the skull was becoming more rounded. H. neanderthalensis first occurs in the fossil record about 200,000 years ago and they died out about 28,000 to 17,000 years ago.  Neandtherthals are believed to have lived in small dispersed groups and to have eaten large amounts of meat.

Around 40,000 years ago, the first H. sapiens in the form of Aurignacians were arriving in Europe. The archeological evidence suggests that they had a low tolerance for the cold and that they migrated southwards around 30,000 years ago to avoid the spreading ice sheets.

It appears that Europe was the last refuge of Neanderthal Man.  While the reasons for their extinction are not by any means fully understood it is currently believed that a number of causes may have worked together, competition with H. sapiens is one of these causes, however others may include a slow birthrate meaning low levels of replacement within the population, environmental changes (the onset of the last ice ages) and maybe even inbreeding with humans, perhaps a result of a scarcity of unrelated Neanderthal partners.

The Aurignacian people were also in serious trouble because of this ice age, but around this time a new group of humans, called the Gravettians started to appear in Eastern Europe. They had more sophisticated tools and, more sophisticated concepts of tool usage, including making clothes. It was this that allowed human beings to survive in Europe.

Genetic Exchange

Recent evidence has shown that most known human groups possess some (between 1% and 9%) Neanderthal DNA.  The exception was thought to be Africans from south of the Sahara, however more modern research (Lu Chen & Aaron Wolf et. al.  2020) suggests Africans too have ancestral Neanderthal DNA to a small degree.  As Humans and Neanderthals  co-existed for tens of thousands of years it is not surprising that some interbreeding occurred.   Therefore it should not be a surprise to discover that several Neanderthal groups have been shown to possess human DNA.   The most recent studies suggest that this cross-breeding occurred far more than once.  Two papers in the journal Nature from 2021 on the subject are here:- Kay Prüfer  & Cosimo Posth et. al. and Mateja Hajdinjak & Fabrizio Mafessoni et. al.

What Next?

Well, I hope this has been an interesting peek into the huge question of human evolution!

Perhaps now you’d like to learn more about the evolution of mammals.

Photo of author

Gordon Ramel

Gordon is an ecologist with two degrees from Exeter University. He's also a teacher, a poet and the owner of 1,152 books. Oh - and he wrote this website.

1 thought on “Human Evolution: What The Fossil Records Say About Our Ancestors”

  1. Hi Gordon,
    Thanks for the webpage ” Human Evolution: What The Fossil Records Say About Our Ancestors”. I’m just a retired Australian engineer/sailor, but reading David Reich’s 2018 book “Who are we and how we got here” caused me to meander further into human evolution on the Internet , and indeed into exactly how DNA is inherited etc, which, having never formally studied biology I really knew very little about (even though my daughter did her PhD researching into ancient Mt DNA of N American bears!)
    Anyway your reference to more recent human DNA evidence from Africa added to my sketchy understanding of the subject.
    Thanks again

    Reply

Leave a Comment